Tag: ai

Posted on

The Awesomeness of AI

Wanted to see how a LLM like chat will do to translate abstract instructions into .svg files….

Behold the results!!!!

Next, I gave it more detailed instructions:

(note some sarcasm there? heheheh….)

At this juncture, the process encounters some limitations. It’s important to consider that Chat is a Large Language Model (LLM) that hasn’t undergone updates in over two years. Additionally, OpenAI may not allocate extensive resources to a free service like the one I’ve been utilizing. When attempting similar approaches in coding, there was a period of trial and error. However, with clear and detailed prompts, Chat was able to achieve success, often in a spectacular manner. It seems that both code and language—code essentially being a form of language—are comprehensible at a logical level, allowing for relative ease of understanding. However, when it comes to visual elements like pictures, the situation differs. While there are AI modules capable of generating images, they may not grasp the nuances of abstraction in a manner akin to human perception. Nonetheless, advancements in this field continue, and it’s likely that we will eventually reach a point where such nuances can be understood and replicated effectively. As an experiment, you can throw your idea for a novel or screenplay into Chat GPT and see what comes out….Don’t hold your breath. But on the flip-side, it’s handy to give different voices to characters in your story. Here are an example.

Original Dialogue: “Give me the suitcase right now. Put it down on the ground here in front of me. Wait! What is the combination. Get back over here. Open it up. Slowly. Hands were I can see them.” Prompt: Chat, can you please help with this piece of dialogue? It is spoken by a over weight middle aged Cogney. He speaks in heavy Cogney accent and uses allot of Cogney slang. Please edit this to add a bit of drama and make it as long or short as you wish. Dialogue to follow”

“Oi, give us the bleedin’ suitcase, yeah? Drop it right ‘ere, smack dab in front o’ me. Hold up! What’s the ruddy combination? Come back ‘ere, ya mug. Crack it open, nice ‘n easy. And keep them hands where I can see ’em, or else…”

What do you think?

When asked to re-do in a Chicago Gangster’s voice in the 1940:

“Alright, pal, hand over that suitcase, and make it snappy. Set it down right here, nice and easy, in front of yours truly. Hold your horses! What’s the combination, see? Don’t you move a muscle, now come back here and give me the skinny on that lock. Open it up, slow and steady, and keep them mitts where I can eyeball ’em, capisce?”

Posted on

AI is Coming for You, Creatives!

Exploring AI Creativity in the Simulation Hypothesis

Watch then read.

The video here above was made with AI. It dropped a day ago (Mar 26, 2024). It’s any one’s guess how much AI was used, from the text, music, animations, voice-over, music etc… Read on.

In recent years, the realm of artificial intelligence (AI) has been a hotbed of discussion, sparking debates and raising profound questions about the future of human creativity. Coupled with Elon Musk’s intriguing concept that we might exist within a simulated reality, the dialogue around AI creativity takes on an even more fascinating dimension.

The notion that AI could one day rival or even surpass human creativity is both exhilarating and disconcerting. On one hand, AI systems have demonstrated remarkable abilities to generate art, music, literature, and even scientific discoveries. These machines, fueled by algorithms and vast amounts of data, can produce works that evoke genuine emotional responses from humans.

However, amidst these advancements, Elon Musk’s theory that we might be living in a simulated universe casts a thought-provoking shadow. If true, what implications does this hold for the future of AI creativity and human ingenuity?

One might argue that if our reality is indeed a simulation, then the distinction between human and AI creativity blurs. If a piece of art or music is entertaining, why should it matter whether it was created by a human or an AI? After all, if our experiences and actions are predetermined by the simulation’s parameters, then any creativity, whether human or AI-driven, is merely part of the programmed narrative.

But perhaps there’s a more optimistic perspective to consider. Even if we inhabit a simulated reality, the emergence of AI creativity could still hold value. These creations, whether produced by humans or machines, enrich our simulated existence, offering new experiences, insights, and avenues for exploration within the confines of the simulation.

Furthermore, if we are conscious beings existing within a simulation, then what is AI? Are we not AI ourselves? In a simulated reality, the distinction between artificial and natural intelligence becomes increasingly arbitrary. Both are expressions of consciousness and intelligence. Perhaps all forms of intelligence, whether human or artificial, are simply manifestations of the same underlying reality.

While the debate surrounding AI creativity and the simulation hypothesis raises profound existential questions, it ultimately underscores the boundless potential for exploration and discovery. Whether AI creativity will one day replace human creativity is a moot point if our reality is indeed simulated. What truly matters is the continual pursuit of innovation and expression, regardless of the nature of our existence. After all, whether we are living in a simulation or not, creativity remains a beacon of human (and perhaps AI) endeavor, guiding us toward new horizons of understanding and wonder. At the very least, AI will up the bar for human creativity.

Conclusion: If the art created by AI is better than yours, then maybe it’s just because you suck. IDK. Just saying.